Hi, I’m Geoff Runcie and I’m back with the latest episode of Fas Incoterms in the International Trade Series featuring renowned global trade expert Murdo Beaton and Abdul Mann, creator of the cloud-based export solution EdgeCTP.

If you’re new to this series, then welcome, I hope you find it useful and that you’re sufficiently inspired to go global.

In this session, Incoterms explained, we’ll be breaking down the eleven Incoterms, explaining what they mean, their application, and the benefits of using them. There’ll be eleven episodes in total so make sure to subscribe to our blog if you don’t want to miss any. Alternatively, feel free to drop me an email on Support or visit our blog.

Fas Incoterms

Now let’s dive into the specific details of Fas Incoterms.

Fas Incoterms

Container Port Sip

Aimee:

Today we’ll be discussing Free Alongside Ship Delivery Terms including how and when to use it. So Murdo, what is Fas Incoterms?

Murdo:

FAS Incoterms stands for Free Alongside Ship. This is not a terribly regularly used Fas Incoterm, nevertheless, it is in the Incoterm list and is a term that is hugely appropriate where there is the transportation of heavy or out-of-gauge items and bulk shipments. Now, for Free Alongside Ship, as the term states the seller is obliged to bring the goods alongside the carrying vessel. Now they can either do so by placing the goods on the quayside if the carrying vessel is able to access at the quay for loading, or they may be obliged to place the goods on a barge and take the barge out to the carrying vessel. This may be anchored slightly outside the port, maybe for the fact that the vessel cannot get into the quay because of the vessel’s draft position.

Abdul:

So the port isn’t deep enough.

Murdo:

The port isn’t deep enough to allow the vessel to come in. So the exporter would have to bring the goods on a barge alongside the ship, wherever it was anchored, or indeed place them on the quay if the vessel was able to load from the quay. The seller would not be obliged to load the vessel. However, the seller would be obliged to clear the goods through customs for export. In other words, any declarations necessary to be lodged with the dispatching market’s customs authorities would have to be done by the exporter, but the loading of the vessel would be the buyer’s responsibility. So indeed would be the procurement of any transport documents that the buyer actually required; the buyer would have to secure these so essentially the risk would pass to the buyer when the exporter brought the goods alongside the ship, wherever she may be berthed and notified the buyer that such an activity had taken place.

Abdul:

So this is one of the first where the Incoterm is designed specifically for marine transportation.

Murdo:

There are four of them and this one is specifically designed for, as they call is, sea and inland waterway transport.

Abdul: this becomes the administration to cost without insurance wait the country of resorting that attempted country. journal evaluation, training out that Right, and it’ very similar from my thinking to FCA, where you were bringing the vehicle alongside the point of delivery, then they would unload, put it onto their own vehicles and take it away.

Murdo:

Yes, there are some similarities to Fas Incoterms as FCA Incoterms. In other words, as far as FCA is concerned as we started when the goods are handed over to the first carrier whoever that might be, the exporter is relieved of any responsibilities. Here for Fas Incoterms, when the goods are delivered alongside the ship that is going to carry them to their ultimate destination, the exporter is likewise relieved of their responsibilities.

(Scroll down to continue……)

Abdul:

OK, and who would kind of be responsible for dictating the use of Fas Incoterms?

Murdo:

A matter again between the seller and the buyer, both parties would have to consider this. I know we keep interchanging between the exporter and the seller.
Abdul:

But they mean the same thing.

Murdo:
Well, not necessarily. There could be an original seller somewhere further down the chain but essentially we are talking about the same thing here for illustrating these terms. Yes, it is a matter of negotiation between the two parties as to what the term would be. If you look at Fas Incoterms you would say would it be possible for the porter to actually load them onto the ship and transport them to the country of destination?’Of course, it would be, but in this instance, the exporter may choose to suggest This is a more favorable Fas Incoterms for me. I don’t want to be involved in loading on board the ship.’ Then you might turn around and say Well it’s quite possible that when we’re talking about heavy and bulk products, it may be that the quantity or size involved may call for a vessel to be specially chartered for the transportation.’ In such cases, the exporter might say ‘Well I don’t want to charter the ship. so the buyer would probably be chartering the vessel as well.

Abdul:
So the booking of the export leg, if that’s what we want to call it is really the responsibility of the buyer, and delivering it to that point of the export leg is the responsibility of the seller.

Murdo:

Yes indeed, the buyer would be expected under Fas Incoterms to nominate the vessel that would undertake the main sea voyage, and would also nominate the port from which that vessel would likely depart. They would also indicate to the exporter the date upon which the exporter would be expected to make the cargo available for loading onto the vessel.

Abdul:
OK, so an easy one for the seller to adopt as a Fas Incoterms?

Murdo:

Well relatively easy. Still, nothing is easy just relatively so. As long as the exporter is comfortable with the domestic transportation of the goods then yes, it’s a comfortable enough Incoterm.

Abdul:

So insurance Murdo, regarding Fas Incoterms.

Murdo:

This would be entirely a matter for the exporter to determine, whether they wish to cover the goods for insurance until such times as they were along with the ship, free incoterms alongside shipping 2010. Covering them beyond that position would be entirely the responsibility of the buyer.

Abdul:

Then clearing customs at the destination market; again the buyer does this.

Murdo:

Yes, they do.

Aimee:

I hope you enjoyed this audio. If you’d like more information on international trade go to www.edgectp.com. All material in this audio is copyrighted and all reproduction rights are reserved by Morgan Goodwin Ltd, thank you.